Sunday, August 19, 2007

Civil Affairs Doctrine for Dummies

Or is it BY dummies?

I don't think it is, of course. But at the same time...

Civil Affairs doctrine is being developed in real time, as Civil Affairs Operators return from Iraq/Afghanistan and furiously attempt to recreate a logical framework to describe what it was they did overseas.

Things sometimes end up jumbled in a pretty confusing fashion. For example, three of the five CA Core tasks are:

1) Support of Civil Administrations (SCA)
2) Foreign Humanitarian Assistance (FHA)
3) Nation Assistance/Management of Civil Authority (NA)

Each Core task has multiple sub-tasks. Many of the sub-tasks are identical from Core task to Core task. For example, a sub-task for Nation Assistance might be to "Perform QC of NA operations and associated costs". Well, simply take that sub-task and replace "NA" w/ "FHA", and wham-o, you have a subtask for FHA. Makes it a lot easier to memorize doctrine for exams and the like.

Except not all tasks are worded the same way, creating all sorts of (questionably necessary) confusion. For example, check out these three supporting tasks.

1) SCA: Coordinate and synchronize collaborative interagency/multiagency SCA operations
2) FHA: Participate in interagency planning and synchronization of FHA operations
3) NA: Synchronize NA projects with other programs, both military and civilian

All of these sub-tasks say more or less the same thing about their respective Core tasks. Does it make sense to re-write the damn thing each time, confusing already confused CA Operators who are trying to wrap their brains around the word casserole that is our ever changing doctrine? Hopefully this is something that they/we will be able to streamline as this process goes forward...but who knows.

Just goes to show...when you're writing the text book as the class goes along, you're bound to have some fun along the way.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Actually, the doctrine is not being written during your class. It's been finalized.

It's always a little difficult to get your head around concepts if they are brand new and you have no anchor points of personal experience with which to relate them, don't worry, once you get down range, they'll maybe make a bit more sense.

And no, doctrine is not written by dummies, but by folks who have been exactly where you are today. The problem is that they sometimes have been so far removed from ground reality, that they sometimes miss the point.

It's good to have dynamic doctrine, that changes based on TTP and experiences of those who implement it. Otherwise, it get stale and useless.

Good luck with the class, we'll see you during the FTX.

Anonymous said...

熊貓情色,美女遊戲區,成人dvd,qq聊天室,aaa片免費看,手槍美女賞圖,家庭教師影片,洪爺情色,麗的色情遊戲,爽翻天成人情趣,qq聊天室,影音日誌,情色典獄長,520聊天室,080 中部人聊天室,成人文章,a片短片,成人貼圖區,免費av,杜蕾斯免費a片,柔情聊天網,豆豆聊天室,性感影片,台灣kiss情色,台灣自拍,都都成人站,小魔女自拍天堂,aaaa片,男男貼圖區,交友私樂園,麗的線上小遊戲,卡通a片,免費情色小說,性感影片,情色聊天室,成人貼圖區,免費av,xxx383美女寫真,正妹強力版,無碼女優,女同聊天室,性愛聊天室,飯島愛,美眉,臺灣情色網,100one百萬成人貼電影,正妹強力牆,bobo寫真女郎影片,av女優,383成人,情人視訊,

3d美女圖,小莉影音像館,情色武俠小說,色美眉部落格,台灣無限貼圖區,完美女人影音網,辣美眉173show影片,自拍a片,kiss情色,熊貓貼圖區列表,自拍貼圖,s383情色大網咖,85cc免費影城,a片圖片,寫真女郎攝影網,豆豆聊天,嘟嘟貼圖,美女自拍,自拍a片,hcg 貼圖區,卡通成人網,聊天室avooo,自拍偷拍,情色文學小說,情色交友,ut男同志聊天室,成人電影,正妹星球,無碼光碟,做愛自拍,爽翻天成人用品,歐美模特兒寫真,999成人性站,免費遊戲,成人動畫,aaaaa片俱樂部,免費線上成人影片,丁字褲美女寫真,老婆自拍,漂亮寶貝,聊天室,情色小遊戲,080 中部人聊天室,裸體寫真,線上看a片,18禁地少女遊戲,後宮情色網,日本女優,月宮貼圖區,

Unknown said...

huhu